Topic

 

The topic of the paper has been left fairly broad to encourage creativity.  A list of past topics chosen by students is included below.  This list is not exhaustive, and some topics may no longer be timely.  The topic should relate to a topic covered in class, or business law. 

 

·         Censorship of Pornography on the Internet

 

Length

               

The paper should be no less than six (6) full typed pages and no more than nine (9) typed pages double spaced.  Penalties will be assessed for failing to meet these requirements.  A penalty of 16% will be assessed for every page, or partial page, less than the six-page minimum.  A penalty of 10% will be assessed for every page, or partial page, over the nine-page maximum. 

 

Margins & Font Size

 

The margins should be no greater than 1 inch on all sides (right, left, top and bottom).  Do not justify the margins.  The size of the font should be 12 point.  You must chose among the following typefaces:  Times New Roman, Arial or Courier New. 

 

Research Type

 

The paper should have at least six sources.  There is no limitation on the maximum number of sources.  Just use an amount necessary for your topic.  At one least one source should come from a primary sources (e.g., statutes, appellate or supreme court cases, or constitutional protections).  At least one source should also come from a scholarly article (e.g. law reviews, or other scholarly journals).  The following Web page explains how to determine whether or not a journal is scholarly: <http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/ENVI/scholjour.html>.

 

Grading

 

This paper will account for 12.5% of your final grade.  The paper will be graded with weighted consistent with the list below.

 

10%                Following instructions on this sheet—including appropriate topic selection and citation accuracy

65%                Quality of Analysis (analytical discussion, quality of citation and integration into the paper)

                                25%                      Quality of Writing (proofreading, editing, conciseness, organization, etc.)

 

Writing Style

 

Writing should generally conform to Chicago Manual of Style (14th ed.; University of Chicago Press).  Spelling should conform to Webster’s International Dictionary.  Another helpful guide to usage and style is the Elements of Style, by William Strunk, Jr., and E. B. White (Macmillan).  The Elements of Style is available for free on the Web at http://www.bartleby.com/141/index.html.   

 

Term Paper Sections

 

                Introduction

               

                The introduction should set the stage for the rest of the paper.  It should tell about the paper’s subject and why the subject is important and timely.  It should layout what must be understood in order to evaluate the thesis and explain how the paper will lay this information out.  Then near the end of the introduction, a thesis or statement of your assertion should be set forth.

 

                Body

 

                The body should layout specific facts or data that support the thesis.  Then, facts or data that run contrary to the thesis should be discussed and attacked.  The discussion of contrary facts should attack their importance.  Manners to attack the importance of contrary facts or data are to: (1) distinguish the facts or data by showing that different things are being compared (e.g., apples and oranges); (2) attack the credibility or reliability of the facts or data; and (3) argue that the applicability of these type of facts or data to this situation, while commonly done is wrong. 

 

                Conclusion

 

                The conclusion should bring everything in the paper together.  It should provide a brief summary of the facts and how they support your argument.  The paper should then explain the ramifications of the thesis being proven, including any future impacts and their importance. 

 

Citations

 

Citations should conform to one of the following methods.

 

(1)     The Bluebook: A Uniform System of Citation (16th ed. 1996).

 

This is the standard citation format for law reviews.  Citations conforming to the following Web page are also acceptable.  See Paul W. Martin, Introduction to Basic Legal Citation (2000-1 ed.) (visited May 18, 2001)  <http://www.law.cornell.edu/citation/citation.table.html>.

 

(2)     Author-Date System

 

This is the style advocated by journals published by the American Accounting Association.  This works cited system uses the “author-date system” keyed to a list of works in the reference list (see below).  Authors should include the relevant page numbers in the cited works.

1.        In the text, works are cited as follows: author's last name and date, without comma, in parentheses: for example, (Jones 1987); with two authors: (Jones and Freeman 1973); with more than two: (Jones et al. 1985); with more than one source cited together: (Jones 1987; Freeman 1986); with two or more works by one author: (Jones 1985, 1987).

2.        Unless confusion would result, do not use "p." or "pp." before page numbers; for example: (Jones 1987, 115).

3.        When the reference list contains more than one work of an author published in the same year, the suffix a, b, etc. follows the date in the text citation: for example, (Jones 1987a) or (Jones 1987a; Freeman 1985b).

4.        If an author's name is mentioned in the text, it is not repeated in the citation; for example: "Jones (1987, 115) says ..."

5.        Citations to institutional works should use acronyms or short titles where practicable; for example: (AAA ASOBAT 1966); (AICPA Cohen Commission Report 1977). Where brief, the full title of an institutional work might be shown in a citation; for example: (ICAEW The Corporate Report 1975).

6.        Reference to a single regulation, government promulgation, or court case should be made in the form illustrated below. Generally, references to multiple works of the same type (e.g., two revenue rulings) or multiple works of different types (e.g., a revenue ruling and a court case) should be made through the use of a footnote unless they are of a brief nature which does not disrupt the flow of the text. The form for tax citations often encountered is presented below.

I.R.C. § 1248(a).
Treas. Reg. § 1.1248-3(a)(4).
Rev. Rul. 82-1, 1982-1 CB 417.
Rev. Proc. 82-1, 1982-1 CB 751.
LTR 8208047 (11/26/80).
43 TC 1654 (1975).
TC Memo 1943-496 (1943).
Thomas v. Smith, 370 F. Supp. 69 (DC-Tx., 1974).
Thomas v. Smith, 656 F. 2d 659 (CT. Cl., 1981).
Thomas v. Smith, 411 F. 2d 1275 (CA-6, 1975).
Thomas v. Smith, 388 U.S. 1492 (1980).

(3)    MLA, as set forth in the Little-Brown Handbook.

Reference List (called Works Cited under MLA)

Every paper must include a list of references containing only those works cited. Each entry should contain all data necessary for unambiguous identification. With the author-date system, use the following format recommended by the Chicago Manual:

1.        Arrange citations in alphabetical order according to surname of the first author or the name of the institution responsible for the citation.

2.        Use author's initials instead of proper names.

3.        In listing more than one name in references (Rayburn, L., and B. Harrelson) there should always be a comma before "and."

4.        Dates of publication should be placed immediately after author's name(s).

5.        Titles of journals should not be abbreviated.

6.        Multiple works by the same author(s) should be listed in chronological order of publication. Two or more works by the same author(s) in the same year are distinguished by letters after the date.

Sample entries are as follows:

American Accounting Association, Committee on Concepts and Standards for External Financial Reports. 1977. Statement on Accounting Theory and Theory Acceptance. Sarasota, FL: AAA.

Auerbach, A., and K. Hassett. 1990. Investment tax policy and the Tax Reform Act of 1986. In Do Taxes Matter: The Impact of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, edited by J. Slemrod. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Bedard, J. C., and S. Biggs. 1990. Pattern Recognition, Hypothesis Generation, and Auditor Performance in Analytical Review. Working paper, University of Connecticut.

Boness, J., and G. Frankfurter. 1977. Evidence of non-homogeneity of capital costs within risk classes. Journal of Finance (June): 775-787.